plan-ceo-review

Evaluate technical plans through multi-mode CEO cognitive pattern review.

Updated Mar 20, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/mihai-chiorean/inc --skill plan-ceo-review-mihai-chiorean
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: plan-ceo-review
Source: https://github.com/mihai-chiorean/inc/tree/main/skills/plan-ceo-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/mihai-chiorean/inc --skill plan-ceo-review-mihai-chiorean

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill addresses the lack of critical oversight in development plans, preventing silent failures, architectural landmines, and scope creep by applying rigorous CEO-level cognitive patterns.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Multi-Mode Review: Choose between Scope Expansion, Selective Expansion, Hold Scope, or Scope Reduction to align the review with your specific project goals.
  • Prime Directive Enforcement: Ensures every plan accounts for error handling, observability, edge cases, and data flow integrity.
  • Implementation Alternatives: Forces the generation of multiple approaches (minimal viable vs. ideal architecture) to ensure the best path is chosen before implementation begins.

Quick Start

Invoke the plan-ceo-review skill to perform a rigorous critique of the current strategy document and identify potential failure modes.

Frequently Asked Questions about plan-ceo-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I audit an engineering roadmap for architectural landmines and scope creep?▼

Audit an engineering roadmap by applying rigorous multi-mode review patterns to technical plans, enforcing failure mode analysis and error mapping to prevent silent failures and architectural scope creep.

What is a CEO-level review for technical project proposals?▼

A CEO-level review evaluates high-stakes engineering decisions by enforcing data flow integrity, observability, and edge case validation to ensure critical project proposals withstand deep strategic scrutiny.

How do I generate implementation alternatives for architectural plans?▼

Generate implementation alternatives by forcing multiple approaches during the review process, comparing minimal viable architectures against ideal designs to identify the best path forward before coding begins.

Can I adjust the scope of my strategy review to match specific project goals?▼

You can adjust strategy review scope using four modes: Scope Expansion, Selective Expansion, Hold Scope, or Scope Reduction, aligning the architectural audit with your specific project requirements.

When do I need failure mode analysis for high-stakes engineering decisions?▼

You need failure mode analysis when validating high-stakes engineering decisions to enforce strict adherence to error handling, observability, and data flow integrity before approving technical plans.