pesquisar-jurisprudencia

Start with buscar_semantica for conceptual questions or buscar_hibrida for maximum relevance, then escalate to buscar_fts, buscar_regex, buscar_por_ontologia, or buscar_por_cnj depending on the query shape. For consolidated positions, query buscar_qualificada first since qualified precedents outweigh isolated acórdãos.

Use buscar_semantica for conceptual themes, buscar_hibrida for best overall relevance, buscar_fts for exact technical terms, buscar_regex for literal citation patterns, buscar_por_cnj for case numbers, buscar_por_ontologia for entire legal branches, and buscar_por_citacoes for citation networks.

No. This skill is explicitly scoped to jurisprudence and its description states it should not be used for laws. Legislation research with vigência checking is handled by a separate legislacao-juris capability in the same plugin.

The desfecho envelope reports query outcome: sem_resultado is a measured zero, erro means the query failed, nao_terminou indicates timeout, parcial means incomplete coverage, and medida_indisponivel means the source carries no measure. Only sem_resultado may be reported as a true absence.

Only buscar_semantica and buscar_hibrida accept the tribunal parameter; buscar_regex, buscar_fts, and buscar_por_ontologia require orgao_code, the lowercase slug instead. Passing tribunal to those tools is rejected, so resend with the correct parameter.

Every citation must originate from a real tool call in the session, carrying the link_completo returned by the source. The skill checks existence, fidelity of ementa and relator, and status_vigencia before delivery, and anything not returned by a tool is reported as not located.