personal-assistant-review-followup

Classify code review findings into release-blocking and optional categories.

149|8|Updated Jun 17, 2022
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/edonyzpc/personal-assistant --skill personal-assistant-review-followup
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: personal-assistant-review-followup
Source: https://github.com/edonyzpc/personal-assistant/tree/main/.agents/skills/personal-assistant-review-followup
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/edonyzpc/personal-assistant --skill personal-assistant-review-followup

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

After a code review of the personal-assistant repository, it is easy to waste time on low-priority polish comments, miss real release risks, or over-fix non-critical issues. This Skill eliminates that inefficiency by clearly separating real problems from optional improvements.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Finding Classification: Automatically categorize review findings into must-fix, should-fix-now, and defer buckets based on release risk, safety, and product contract impact.
  • Decision Support: Provide structured lenses for architecture, program, and product decisions when findings require input before implementation.
  • Safe Implementation & Validation: Implement only user-confirmed fixes, add regression tests for accepted issues, and run focused validation checks to avoid over-claiming functionality.
  • Use Case: After a team or human code review of the personal-assistant Obsidian plugin, use this Skill to quickly identify which findings block release, which need product decisions, and safely implement only the necessary fixes.

Quick Start

Use the personal-assistant-review-followup skill to triage the latest code review findings for the personal-assistant repository, decide which fixes to implement, and validate the changes.

Frequently Asked Questions about personal-assistant-review-followup

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I triage code review findings to separate release-blocking issues from optional polish?▼

Triage code review findings by categorizing them into must-fix, should-fix-now, and defer buckets based on release risk, safety, and product contract impact. This separates real release risks from optional improvements.

How do I implement confirmed fixes from a code review and validate the results?▼

Implement confirmed fixes by selectively applying user-accepted changes, adding regression tests for those accepted issues, and running focused validation checks without over-claiming app runtime behavior.

What is the best way to classify the severity of code review findings for a plugin release?▼

Classify code review finding severity by evaluating release risks, safety implications, and product contract impact. This process helps separate release-blocking issues from optional polish.

Does this code review triage process support adding regression tests for accepted fixes?▼

Yes, the code review triage process supports adding regression tests for accepted issues. It implements user-confirmed fixes and runs focused validation checks to ensure safe implementation.

How do I handle code review findings that require product or architecture decisions before implementation?▼

Handle code review findings requiring decisions by applying structured lenses for architecture, program, and product decisions. This provides decision support before implementing confirmed fixes.

When should I avoid over-claiming app runtime behavior during fix validation?▼

Avoid over-claiming app runtime behavior during fix validation by running only focused validation checks on accepted issues. This ensures you validate implemented fixes without asserting unrelated functionality.