peer-review

Automate systematic review of scientific manuscripts and grant proposals.

Updated May 8, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Zeyuyang-0420/bio-ai-research-skills --skill peer-review-zeyuyang-0420
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: peer-review
Source: https://github.com/Zeyuyang-0420/bio-ai-research-skills/tree/main/categories/scientific-communication/peer-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Zeyuyang-0420/bio-ai-research-skills --skill peer-review-zeyuyang-0420

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides a structured framework for reviewing scientific manuscripts and grant proposals, enhancing the efficiency and thoroughness of the review process.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured Checklists: Utilizes checklist-based evaluation for methodology, statistics, and reporting standards.
  • Visual Enhancements: Recommends the inclusion of scientific schematics to improve document clarity and communication.
  • Systematic Workflow: Guides through stages of review including initial assessment, detailed section-by-section review, and ethical considerations.
  • Review Report Organization: Offers a structured approach to writing comprehensive peer review reports.

Quick Start

To review a manuscript using the peer-review skill, follow these steps:

  1. Run the script to assess the manuscript scope, novelty, and overall quality.
  2. Conduct a detailed review of each section with specific questions and considerations.
  3. Evaluate the technical quality and reproducibility of the research.
  4. Prepare the review report with a summary statement, major and minor comments, and specific questions for the authors.

Frequently Asked Questions about peer-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I conduct a structured peer review for scientific manuscripts?▼

Conduct a structured peer review by running the Python script to assess scope and novelty, evaluating methodology section-by-section, checking reporting standards, and generating a report with major and minor comments.

What is the best way to evaluate grant proposals systematically?▼

Evaluating grant proposals systematically requires checklist-based frameworks to assess technical quality, reproducibility, and ethical considerations, culminating in a structured review report with specific questions for the authors.

How do I write a comprehensive peer review report?▼

Write a comprehensive peer review report by organizing your findings into a summary statement, detailing major and minor comments, and listing specific questions for authors based on systematic section-by-section evaluation.

Does this peer review skill require Python to run?▼

Yes, this peer review skill requires Python scripts for analysis and reporting, which automate the systematic evaluation of methodology, statistics, and reporting standards for scientific manuscripts.

Can I use checklists to assess methodology and statistics in research papers?▼

Yes, you can use structured checklists to assess methodology and statistics in research papers, guiding your initial assessment, detailed section-by-section review, and evaluation of reporting standards and reproducibility.