What problem does it solve? Getting a second opinion on specs, plans, code changes, or design decisions requires switching tools and manually copying context, and self-review by the same agent that wrote the work misses blind spots. This Skill dispatches review prompts to external CLI agents (Cursor, Codex, Claude, Gemini) so the reviewer is always a different agent than the author. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Multi-agent dispatch: Send a review prompt to one specific agent (cursor, codex, claude, gemini) or run all available agents in parallel and present each result under a labeled heading. - Context serialization: External CLIs cannot see the current conversation, so the Skill packages specs, issue bodies (via gh issue view), file paths, and diffs into the prompt, using temp files for long content. - Anti-recursion and grounding guardrails: Every prompt instructs the reviewer not to delegate to other CLIs while encouraging read-only file inspection, preventing recursive agent invocation and ungrounded reviews. - Use Case: After drafting an API design spec, run /peer-review codex What's wrong with this API design? to get Codex's critique, then post the feedback as a new comment while preserving the original spec for an auditable review trail. ## Quick Start Ask the agent to run /peer-review with a prompt like Review this spec for completeness to send it to all available reviewer agents in parallel.