peer-review

Evaluate manuscripts with checklist-driven peer review against reporting guidelines.

1|Updated Mar 4, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Hung-3008/agusta --skill peer-review-hung-3008
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: peer-review
Source: https://github.com/Hung-3008/agusta/tree/main/.agents/skills/peer-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Hung-3008/agusta --skill peer-review-hung-3008

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Peer-review is a structured evaluative process that codifies subjective judgments into repeatable, checklist-driven feedback, helping reviewers produce rigorous, consistent assessments with clear recommendations.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Checklist-based evaluation: Applies stage-by-stage criteria (methodology, statistics, ethics, reporting standards) to manuscript assessments.
  • Guided feedback generation: Produces actionable recommendations aligned with established guidelines (CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA) and best-practice reporting.
  • Workflow and reproducibility: Provides a repeatable peer-review workflow that can be applied across disciplines and manuscript types.

Quick Start

Initiate a structured peer-review of the manuscript using the provided checklist to generate rigorous, standards-compliant feedback.

Frequently Asked Questions about peer-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I perform a structured peer review of a research manuscript?▼

Yes, you can evaluate manuscripts against established reporting guidelines like CONSORT, STROBE, and PRISMA using a checklist-driven framework that generates actionable recommendations aligned with best-practice reporting standards.

Can I use this structured peer-review workflow for grant reviews?▼

Checklist-based peer review codifies subjective judgments into repeatable, criteria-driven assessments, helping reviewers produce rigorous, consistent feedback with clear recommendations rather than relying on unstructured opinions.

What guidelines are supported for reporting standards evaluation?▼

The process provides a repeatable, reproducible workflow with stage-by-stage prompts and guideline references that can be applied across different disciplines and manuscript types for consistent assessments.

Does structured peer review work across different disciplinary contexts?▼

The workflow breaks down manuscript assessment into stage-by-stage criteria covering methodology, statistics, ethics, and reporting standards, guiding you through each evaluation phase systematically.