peer-review

What problem does it solve?

Manual peer review is a time-consuming and complex process, demanding expertise across diverse domains like methodology, statistics, ethics, and reporting. This Skill automates the systematic evaluation of scientific manuscripts and grants, ensuring rigor, consistency, and comprehensive feedback, ultimately saving reviewers valuable time.

Core Features & Use Cases

• Comprehensive Evaluation: Systematically assesses methodology, statistics, design, reproducibility, ethics, figure integrity, and reporting standards across disciplines.
• Structured Feedback Generation: Produces organized reports with prioritized major and minor comments, actionable suggestions, and a clear summary statement.
• Presentation Review Workflow: Includes a unique, mandatory image-based process for evaluating scientific presentations, identifying visual formatting and content issues that text-based review misses.
• Use Case: A busy journal editor needs to provide a rigorous, constructive review for a complex research paper. This Skill guides the evaluation process, ensuring all critical aspects are covered, from statistical rigor to ethical considerations, and helps generate a structured report quickly.

Quick Start

Review the attached manuscript 'research_paper.pdf' for methodological rigor and ethical considerations. Provide a summary statement and major comments. If reviewing a presentation, first convert 'presentation.pdf' to images using: pdftoppm -jpeg -r 150 presentation.pdf review/slide Then, review the generated slide images.