paper-review

Automate multi-round undergraduate thesis reviews with DOCX annotations and revision tasks.

1|Updated Mar 16, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/alonegg/skills --skill paper-review-alonegg
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: paper-review
Source: https://github.com/alonegg/skills/tree/main/paper-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/alonegg/skills --skill paper-review-alonegg

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires defusedxml, and includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Paper Review & Annotation enables educators to perform systematic, multi-round critiques of undergraduate theses, turning vague feedback into concrete, actionable tasks.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Five-phase multi-round review workflow: full thesis understanding, structural evaluation, paragraph-level critique, issue aggregation, and revision iteration.
  • Structured diagnostics and actionable revision tasks: outputs a repair task list with priority levels and next-step guidance.
  • DOCX integration and annotation: produces annotated Word documents with tracked comments and a separate audit/summary output.
  • Stateful review management: maintains a review_state.json to support resume, cross-round tracking, and auditability.

Quick Start

Upload an undergraduate thesis to start a five-phase review that yields a structured diagnostic report and a prioritized revision task list.

Frequently Asked Questions about paper-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate multi-round thesis review with structured revision tasks?▼

Automating multi-round thesis review involves a five-phase workflow that evaluates document structure, critiques paragraphs, and aggregates issues into a prioritized revision task list. This produces an annotated DOCX file and a persistent review state for tracking.

Can I add tracked annotations directly to a DOCX file during thesis review?▼

Yes, tracked annotations can be added directly to a DOCX file during thesis review. The workflow integrates with DOCX processing to embed Word comments into the document while generating a separate audit-ready summary output.

What is a multi-phase review workflow for undergraduate theses?▼

A multi-phase review workflow for undergraduate theses systematically evaluates work through five stages: full understanding, structural evaluation, paragraph-level critique, issue aggregation, and revision iteration. This ensures feedback evolves from broad assessment to specific, actionable modifications.

Does this thesis review workflow support resuming across multiple revision rounds?▼

Yes, this thesis review workflow supports resuming across multiple revision rounds. It maintains a persistent review_state.json file that captures diagnostics and modification guidance, enabling cross-round tracking, auditability, and seamless continuation.

How do I turn vague academic feedback into actionable revision tasks?▼

To turn vague academic feedback into actionable revision tasks, aggregate paragraph-level critiques into a structured diagnostic report. The workflow assigns priority levels and next-step guidance, converting broad comments into a specific repair task list.