What problem does it solve? After a research paper is compiled, authors often fall into open-ended revision loops or accept unsupported reviewer suggestions. This Skill bounds manuscript revision to at most two issue-driven passes plus one consolidated factual check, keeping edits evidence-backed and preventing scope creep. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Two Bounded Revision Passes: Pass 1 audits argument and evidence (claim-evidence alignment, contribution statement, section order); Pass 2 audits presentation (terminology, captions, page budget, figure readability). - Severity-Tagged Issue Tracking: Every actionable issue is recorded with severity (critical, major, minor), location, evidence, and a minimal fix, with recompilation after material edits. - Final Factual Check: Writes paper/FINAL_CHECK.md mapping headline claims to evidence, verifying reported numbers against raw artifacts, and validating citations, figures, and venue rules. - Use Case: After compiling a venue-neutral research paper, run this Skill to tighten claim wording, fix caption and layout issues, and produce a final factual audit without adding new experiments or altering the promoted research pipeline. ## Quick Start Use the paper-polish skill to revise the compiled manuscript through bounded evidence-backed passes and produce the final factual check.
