What problem does it solve? Manually checking a research paper against reporting guidelines like PRISMA, CONSORT, or STROBE is slow and error-prone. This Skill automates the full appraisal pipeline: it identifies the study design from the abstract, applies the correct international reporting and risk-of-bias guidelines, and outputs a structured Markdown evaluation report. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Automatic study design identification: Parses the abstract with a keyword decision tree to classify the paper as SR/meta-analysis, RCT, cohort, case-control, cross-sectional, diagnostic accuracy, or case report, then confirms with the user. - Guideline-based item appraisal: Lazy-loads only the relevant guideline files (PRISMA 2020, CONSORT 2010, STROBE, STARD, CARE, AMSTAR 2, RoB 2.0, ROBINS-I, QUADAS-2, NOS) and rates each item as Yes / Partial Yes / No / N/A with evidence and improvement suggestions. - GRADE certainty grading: For systematic reviews and meta-analyses, rates the certainty of evidence per outcome across the five downgrade domains and three upgrade criteria. - Use Case: Before submitting a manuscript, ask the agent to evaluate your RCT draft; it identifies the design, checks all 25 CONSORT items plus RoB 2.0 domains, and returns a compliance report with prioritized revision recommendations. ## Quick Start Evaluate the attached paper 'my-manuscript.pdf' against the appropriate reporting guidelines and generate a full assessment report.
