What problem does it solve? Turning a finished experiment into a publication-ready paper usually means manually reassembling results, figures, citations, and negative findings scattered across reports — and then losing track of which paper version corresponds to which experimental record. This Skill authors the LaTeX paper directly from the approved Chronicle experiment record and attaches each revision as a compiled, recorded snapshot on the experiment. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Record-grounded drafting: Gathers approved takeaways and variation reports, figure assets (PDF/SVG renditions), lessons, and registered citations via the chronicle MCP tools so every number and \cite in the paper traces to the record. - Local LaTeX authoring: Writes the paper in the researcher's own working tree and template, with figure asset IDs annotated in comments for provenance and negative results stated plainly. - Snapshot attach and compile: Uploads the source as a latex_source asset and calls POST /v1/experiments/{id}/papers so Chronicle compiles it into an imported_report; re-attaching on meaningful revisions keeps a versioned record. - Use Case: After approving a takeaways report, ask the agent to draft the paper — it pulls the approved reports and figures, writes main.tex with a bibliography mapped to registered publications, attaches the source for server-side compilation, and reports the citation ledger. ## Quick Start Draft a LaTeX paper from experiment <id> using my current directory as the working tree and attach it to the experiment record.
