What problem does it solve? After shipping a change, teams rarely know whether it actually held up. This Skill measures outcomes retrospectively by reading the repository's own future — reverted commits, deleted or skipped tests, rewritten files, and broken promises — without any telemetry, vendor, or instrumentation. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Signal-based grading: Detects reverts, removed or skipped tests, broken pact promises, and post-ship file churn, each with a strength rating, from git log, ORC traces, and the pact ledger. - Evidence-backed reports: Writes orc-aftermath/<period>/aftermath.md where every signal names its files, commits, or pact ids, plus a structured block that /orc-retro aggregates. - Blame-free by design: Reports signals and their strength, never verdicts, never person names, and marks runs under 7 days old as too recent to grade. - Use Case: Ask "what did we ship last month and how did it go" and receive a per-run report comparing each run's promised acceptance criteria against what the repository now shows. ## Quick Start Ask the agent to run /orc-aftermath to grade the last 30 days of shipped runs and write the aftermath report.