on-page-seo-auditor

Provide the page URL and target keyword, and the audit runs 11 steps covering title tag, meta description, headers, content quality, keyword usage, internal links, images, and technical elements. Each section is scored out of 10 and rolled into a weighted score out of 100 with prioritized fixes.

This audit workflow covers the same on-page checks as Screaming Frog or Yoast, including title length, H1 structure, keyword placement, image alt text, and schema. It additionally scores content against a 17-item CORE-EEAT quality benchmark and outputs a prioritized repair plan.

Yes. When no keyword is provided, the audit infers a primary keyword candidate from the page's H1, title tag, meta description, and H2 topics, then proceeds with a preliminary audit flagged as DONE_WITH_CONCERNS. You should validate the inferred keyword against search volume data before acting.

Use bulk audit mode for 5+ URLs: provide a URL list, sitemap, or content-type scope. The workflow groups URLs into template clusters, samples 2-3 per cluster, extrapolates pattern-level findings, and delivers portfolio-level P0/P1/P2 priorities instead of per-page reports.

Titles and meta descriptions carry only 20% of the weighted score. Content quality (25%), keyword optimization (15%), and internal links (10%) often dominate ranking problems, so check thin content, missing internal links, and weak E-E-A-T signals like absent author credentials or citations.