What problem does it solve? Mobile UI reviews often rely on static screenshots and subjective taste, missing accessibility failures, unsafe state handling, and broken recovery paths. This Skill provides a structured, evidence-based audit workflow for evaluating whether a mobile experience supports a complete, safe user task. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Evidence-laddered review: Scores confidence based on artifact quality, from executable builds down to written concepts, and refuses to claim interaction behavior from static screenshots. - Structured audit workflow: Walks through task definition, hierarchy inspection, critical-path execution, system-state testing, accessibility audit, feedback/recovery checks, and copy evaluation. - Scoring rubric and vetoes: Applies a 0-4 behavioral rubric across nine dimensions with explicit pass/fail verdict rules and hard vetoes for unsafe or inaccessible paths. - Use Case: Before shipping an iOS release, run the reviewer against Simulator builds and screenshots to verify Dynamic Type, VoiceOver order, permission-denial handling, and retry safety, then receive a findings packet with reproduction steps and corrections. ## Quick Start Use the mobile-ux-reviewer skill to audit this iOS screenshot flow for accessibility, hierarchy, and recovery issues.
