What problem does it solve? Public-facing documents like READMEs and release notes often contain claims that are outdated, exaggerated, or unsupported, and manually auditing every statement against project evidence is slow and error-prone. This Skill performs a read-only audit that decomposes document statements into atomic claims and labels each one against the evidence you supply. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Atomic Claim Decomposition: Splits composite sentences (e.g., platform lists, version floors, install steps) into individually checkable claims so no gap hides inside a passing verdict. - Four-Label Decision Tree: Assigns exactly one label per claim — verified, stale-suspected, unsupported (with a reason), or needs-human — using an ordered gate process with tie-break rules. - Strict Read-Only Boundaries: Runs no commands, produces no fixes, and performs no code or security review; it names the exact command a maintainer should run instead. - Use Case: Before publishing a release note claiming "latest release is 3.1.0 with 12 plugins", supply the tag listing and plugin directory as evidence and receive a row-by-row report flagging stale counts and unsupported statements. ## Quick Start Audit the attached README against the supplied evidence files and report which claims are verified, stale, unsupported, or need human verification.