MGT675-Research-Project

Applies literature-review frameworks for source analysis, synthesis, and research writing.

Updated Aug 21, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/iTzFaisal/MBA-Brain --skill mgt675-research-project-itzfaisal
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: MGT675-Research-Project
Source: https://github.com/iTzFaisal/MBA-Brain/tree/main/.agents/skills/MGT675-Research-Project
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/iTzFaisal/MBA-Brain --skill mgt675-research-project-itzfaisal

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve? Writing a rigorous literature review requires more than summarizing articles: researchers must select quality sources, analyze their integrity, compare and contrast findings, synthesize compatible evidence, and integrate contradictions without bias. This Skill provides a structured knowledge base of literature-review frameworks from Paula Dawidowicz's "Literature Reviews Made Easy" to guide that entire workflow. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Six-Lens Critical Thinking Chain: Apply analysis, comparison, contrast, evaluation, synthesis, and integration to the same evidence using the Critical Thinking Chart and Spider Web synthesis model. - Source Selection & Objective Research: Use abstract-based relevance triage, fit-based source weighting, and a structured objectivity sequence that searches for confirmations, denials, and modifications. - Drafting & Revision Guidance: Apply citation-as-boundary writing, COLR peer critique, living outlines, and diagnosis-driven revision with a cheatsheet of decision thresholds and failure tells. - Use Case: An MBA student writing the MGT675 research project can ask how to reconcile two conflicting studies, and receive a conditional integration approach that inspects populations, methods, timing, and limitations before drawing conclusions. ## Quick Start Ask the skill to help you analyze and synthesize the sources for your research topic using the six-lens literature review workflow.

Frequently Asked Questions about MGT675-Research-Project

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I write a literature review for a research project?▼

Start by defining the review type (simple, applied, or academic) and narrowing the research question by population, setting, time, and factors. Then follow the objective research sequence: search, outline, seek confirmations and denials, and apply analysis, comparison, contrast, evaluation, synthesis, and integration.

How do I synthesize sources in a literature review?▼

Use the Spider Web model: sort compatible and complementary findings by the dimension, group, and setting each illuminates, then weave them into a bounded framework. Preserve each study's population and conditions, and place synthesis before conclusions.

How do I handle conflicting findings in research articles?▼

Apply integration rather than choosing a winner: revisit populations, contexts, procedures, measures, timing, and limitations, then formulate a conditional both-and explanation. Preserve both findings and label any unsupported links as provisional.

When should I quote versus paraphrase sources?▼

Prefer paraphrase for most source content, preserving qualifiers, population, limitations, and degree of support with proper citation. Quote only when the exact wording is unusually precise or valuable, and always cite the author actually read.

What are the limitations of this literature review guidance?▼

The skill covers general literature-review reasoning and writing, not discipline-specific research methods, statistical guidance, ethics requirements, or citation manuals. Generalizability and transferability claims must stay within the populations, methods, and contexts documented by the literature.