meow:plan-ceo-review

Reviews plans via CEO-level workflow with Premise Challenge, Scope Decision, Analysis phases.

14|2|Updated Mar 25, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/ngocsangyem/MeowKit --skill meow-plan-ceo-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: meow:plan-ceo-review
Source: https://github.com/ngocsangyem/MeowKit/tree/main/.claude/skills/meow%3Aplan-ceo-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/ngocsangyem/MeowKit --skill meow-plan-ceo-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Performs rigorous CEO-level plan reviews to validate ambitious yet feasible strategy by applying four modes (Expansion, Selective Expansion, Hold Scope, Scope Reduction) and a structured review workflow.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured, multi-stage evaluation of plans with premise challenges, scope decisions, and mode-specific analyses to surface risks and opportunities.
  • Handoff-ready outputs, references, and diagrams to align stakeholders and ensure traceability.
  • Plan persistence and versioning to maintain a living record of decisions and future review readiness.

Quick Start

Run /meow:plan-ceo-review to start the CEO plan review workflow.

Frequently Asked Questions about meow:plan-ceo-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I conduct a CEO-level plan review for a high-stakes product initiative?▼

A CEO plan review validates ambitious strategy and ensures feasible scope through a structured workflow, applying four modes: Expansion, Selective Expansion, Hold Scope, and Scope Reduction to guide scope decisions and risk assessment.

What is the best way to assess risk and scope feasibility for an ambitious product strategy?▼

Risk assessment and scope feasibility are evaluated through multi-stage premise challenges and mode-specific analyses. This structured review process surfaces hidden risks and opportunities to align stakeholders on feasible scope decisions.

How does plan persistence and versioning work for strategy reviews?▼

Plan persistence and versioning maintain a living record of decisions through mandatory frontmatter, references, and plan-logging artifacts. This enables traceability, governance, and future review readiness across high-stakes product initiatives.

Can I generate handoff-ready outputs with diagrams for stakeholder alignment?▼

Yes, the review workflow generates handoff-ready outputs, references, and diagrams to align stakeholders. These artifacts ensure traceability and governance for high-stakes product initiatives throughout the scope decision process.

When should I use scope reduction mode versus expansion mode in a plan review?▼

Scope reduction mode applies when feasible scope must contract to manage risk, while expansion mode validates ambitious strategy growth. Selective expansion and hold scope modes address intermediate scenarios in high-stakes product initiatives.

What artifacts are required for traceability and governance in strategy plan reviews?▼

Mandatory frontmatter, references, diagrams, and plan-logging artifacts enforce traceability and governance. These structured outputs maintain a living record of decisions and ensure future review readiness for ambitious product strategies.