meaning-review

Batch-review meaning index suggestions and auto-accept high-confidence changes.

1|Updated Jan 23, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/bozaah/meaning-fs --skill meaning-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: meaning-review
Source: https://github.com/bozaah/meaning-fs/tree/main/.claude/skills/meaning-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/bozaah/meaning-fs --skill meaning-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill addresses the time-consuming task of reviewing automated index suggestions and approving changes at scale, ensuring high accuracy while reducing manual effort.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Batch review: Automatically classify suggestions into auto-accept, recently added, and manual review groups.
  • Safe automation: Auto-accepts high-confidence changes (confidence ≥ 0.8) and notes any low-confidence items for human review.
  • Audit-ready outputs: Logs applied changes and validates index health after updates.

Quick Start

Run /meaning-review to batch-process index suggestions. Use /meaning-review --interactive to review low-confidence items manually.

Frequently Asked Questions about meaning-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I batch-review codebase index suggestions to reduce manual effort?▼

Batch-reviewing codebase index suggestions classifies automated changes into auto-accept, recently added, and manual review groups, auto-accepting high-confidence updates to reduce manual effort while flagging low-confidence items for human review.

What is metadata inference for codebase indexing and how does it work?▼

Metadata inference for codebase indexing automatically proposes intent updates, tag additions, and relationship mappings across files. Suggestions are generated with confidence scores, and changes meeting a high threshold are applied automatically to the index.

How do I auto-accept high-confidence index changes while keeping low-confidence items for manual review?▼

Auto-accepting high-confidence index changes requires a threshold-based flow where suggestions scoring above 0.8 are applied automatically, while lower-scoring items are categorized for manual review to ensure index accuracy and safety.

Can I interactively review low-confidence index suggestions instead of skipping them?▼

Interactively reviewing low-confidence index suggestions is supported by running the process with an interactive flag, letting you manually inspect and decide on items below the auto-accept threshold instead of leaving them unprocessed.

How do I validate index health after applying automated codebase updates?▼

Validating index health after applying automated codebase updates happens automatically post-batch, where the system logs all applied changes and runs a validation check to ensure the updated index remains consistent and accurate.

What is the best way to handle AI-driven codebase indexing at scale without losing accuracy?▼

Handling AI-driven codebase indexing at scale without losing accuracy relies on threshold-based batch processing, auto-accepting high-confidence metadata inferences while routing uncertain suggestions to a manual review queue for human oversight.