What problem does it solve? Marketing decisions often suffer from a single perspective or an echo chamber that simply validates existing plans. This Skill convenes a simulated advisory board of twelve legendary marketers — from Ogilvy and Schwartz to Dunford, Hormozi, and Byron Sharp — so you see genuine disagreement and real trade-offs before committing to a direction. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Three session modes: quick take (one advisor), council session (3–5 advisors), or full council (all 12) matched to the stakes of the decision. - Grounded persona simulation: each take applies the advisor's documented frameworks from dossier files in references/advisors/, with strict rules against fabricated quotes or invented endorsements. - Disagreement map and synthesis: surfaces 2–4 genuine conflicts between advisors, names the underlying trade-offs, and ends with a chair's recommendation plus handoffs to execution skills like positioning, offers, or copywriting. - Use Case: Before cutting your SaaS price 40% to counter a cheaper rival, convene the council — Hormozi argues value-equation math, Sutherland warns about price-as-signal, and the synthesis tells you which evidence would settle the debate. ## Quick Start Ask the marketing council to review your pricing change, launch plan, or landing page and specify whether you want a quick take, a council session, or the full council.
