What problem does it solve? A single AI answer gives you only one perspective, with no way to judge its quality. This Skill pressure-tests important decisions by running them through five independent advisors with different thinking styles, then having them peer-review each other before a chairman synthesizes a final verdict. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Five-Perspective Analysis: Spawns Contrarian, First Principles, Expansionist, Outsider, and Executor sub-agents in parallel, each arguing fully from its own angle. - Anonymous Peer Review: Advisor responses are anonymized and cross-reviewed to surface the strongest argument, biggest blind spots, and what everyone missed. - Chairman Verdict: A final synthesis delivers where the council agrees, where it clashes, a direct recommendation, and one concrete next step. - Use Case: You're deciding between launching a $97 workshop or a $497 course. The council stress-tests pricing, positioning, and execution risk from five angles, then gives you a clear recommendation instead of a hedge. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to council this decision: should I hire a VA or build an automation first, given my current workload and budget?
