ljg-qa

Extract a text's core argument into an interconnected Q-A chain in org-mode format.

6.8k|781|Updated Mar 8, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/lijigang/ljg-skills --skill ljg-qa
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ljg-qa
Source: https://github.com/lijigang/ljg-skills/tree/main/skills/ljg-qa
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/lijigang/ljg-skills --skill ljg-qa

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

读一本文章/论文/书籍时,将其论证骨架拆解为一条清晰的 Q-A 链,强调“为什么/怎么/边界”,以便复现作者推理而非简单摘要。

Core Features & Use Cases

  • 将复杂论证转化为一个互相关联的 Q-A 路径,聚焦原因、过程、边界,而非表面结论。
  • 强制每个问答的四段结构:结论、形式化、怎么想到的、边界,以确保可抄走且可审计。
  • 遵循清晰工作流,支持对文章 URL、PDF 或文本进行核心观点提取,并输出 org-mode 格式的 Q-A。
  • 适用于研究、批判性阅读与教学场景,帮助读者复现原文推理路径。

Quick Start

将文章或文本输入,生成一个5-10条Q-A链,输出为org-mode格式。

Frequently Asked Questions about ljg-qa

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I extract core arguments from a research paper into an interconnected Q-A chain?▼

This Skill extracts the core argument by generating a 5-10 question sequence in org-mode format. It enforces a four-part answer structure covering conclusion, formalization, derivation, and boundaries to reproduce the author's reasoning.

What is the best way to formalize critical reading notes for argument analysis?▼

Formalizing critical reading notes is best achieved by enforcing a four-part answer structure: Conclusion, Formalization, How it was derived, and Boundaries. This structure ensures extracted arguments are auditable and reproducible rather than simple summaries.

How to generate org-mode formatted questions from article URLs or text for knowledge extraction?▼

You generate org-mode formatted questions by inputting article URLs, PDFs, or text into the workflow. The Skill then outputs a directional Q-A chain that enforces logical flow and relevance between the interconnected questions.

Does this argument analysis workflow work for both academic papers and full books?▼

Yes, this argument analysis workflow applies to articles, academic papers, and full books. It processes any input text to produce a 5-10 question sequence that reconstructs the original reasoning path for research or teaching.

What are the limitations of using automated question design for critical reading?▼

A limitation of automated question design is that the output is restricted to a 5-10 question sequence in org-mode format. It focuses strictly on reasoning boundaries and derivation rather than producing comprehensive surface-level summaries.