Literature Review

Guides systematic literature search, critical appraisal, synthesis, and gap identification for academic research.

1|Updated Mar 5, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/fabioc-aloha/AlexAgent --skill literature-review-fabioc-aloha
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: Literature Review
Source: https://github.com/fabioc-aloha/AlexAgent/tree/main/plugin/skills/literature-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/fabioc-aloha/AlexAgent --skill literature-review-fabioc-aloha

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Academic researchers struggle to turn hundreds of scattered sources into a coherent, defensible literature review. This Skill provides structured workflows for reproducible database searches, source screening, quality appraisal, thematic synthesis, and gap articulation. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Systematic Search Strategy: Build reproducible search protocols using the PICO(S) framework, Boolean search strings, and multi-database coverage (Google Scholar, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycINFO). - Critical Appraisal & Synthesis: Apply quality checklists for quantitative, qualitative, and SEM studies, then integrate findings through thematic coding and comparative matrices. - Gap Identification & Writing: Classify empirical, theoretical, methodological, and contextual gaps, then structure the review using funnel, thematic, or chronological organization with synthesis-focused phrasing. - Use Case: A doctoral student researching AI adoption uses the Skill to construct a search protocol across Scopus and ACM Digital Library, screen 200 hits down to 30 core sources, and write a synthesized literature review chapter that clearly articulates the research gap. ## Quick Start Ask the AI to load the literature-review skill and help design a systematic search strategy for your research question.

Frequently Asked Questions about Literature Review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I conduct a systematic literature review for academic research?▼

Start by framing your question with the PICO(S) framework, then build Boolean search strings and run them across multiple databases like Scopus and Web of Science. Screen results through title, abstract, and full-text stages, then synthesize themes and articulate the research gap.

What databases should I search for a literature review?▼

Google Scholar works for broad discovery and citation tracking, Scopus and Web of Science for comprehensive multidisciplinary coverage, ACM Digital Library for computer science, and PsycINFO for psychology. Using multiple databases reduces the risk of a too-narrow search.

How do I identify a research gap in existing literature?▼

Classify gaps as empirical, theoretical, methodological, contextual, or temporal, then articulate what is known, what is missing, and why it matters. Signal phrases like "no study has examined" or "prior studies relied on" help locate opportunities.

What is the difference between synthesis and summary in a literature review?▼

Summary lists findings source by source, while synthesis integrates them by showing agreement, contrast, and extension across studies. Strong reviews use transition phrases like "consistent with" and "building on" to weave sources into an argument.

How do I assess the quality of sources for a literature review?▼

Evaluate validity, reliability, generalizability, rigor, and transparency using study-type checklists. For SEM studies, verify model fit indices, convergent validity (AVE ≥ .50), discriminant validity (HTMT < .85), and adequate sample size.