lid-coach

Identify and quantify drift between project artifacts and LID principles.

90|14|Updated Apr 11, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/jszmajda/lid --skill lid-coach
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: lid-coach
Source: https://github.com/jszmajda/lid/tree/main/plugins/linked-intent-dev/skills/lid-coach
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/jszmajda/lid --skill lid-coach

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill helps teams evaluate how closely a project's HLD, LLDs, EARS specs, and related documentation align with LID principles, surfacing drift and providing a prioritized advisory plan to close gaps.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Advisory, principle-level reviews that surface drift relative to LID principles and link findings to concrete actions.
  • Supports both fully configured LID projects and brownfield codebases, adapting the depth of review to scope.
  • Guidance on next steps, including reconciliation with /update-lid or arrow-maintenance checks, or clarifying questions to the team, without modifying code automatically.

Quick Start

Run /lid-coach on a configured project to receive an executive advisory report.

Frequently Asked Questions about lid-coach

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I check if my project documentation aligns with LID principles?▼

To check LID principles alignment, you can review project artifacts like HLD, LLDs, and EARS specs to identify drift, quantify the gaps, and generate a prioritized advisory report with concrete next steps to close them.

What is the best way to review HLD and LLD drift in a brownfield codebase?▼

Reviewing HLD and LLD drift in a brownfield codebase involves scanning existing governance artifacts and documentation scope to surface principle misalignments and ownership issues, adapting review depth to the project's current state.

Can I use an advisory review to find documentation scope and ownership issues?▼

Yes, an advisory review can find documentation scope and ownership issues by evaluating project artifacts against LID principles, generating a report that documents cascade issues and links findings to targeted questions for the team.

Does the LID advisory process automatically modify code to fix governance gaps?▼

The LID advisory process does not automatically modify code; it generates a prioritized advisory report that suggests concrete next steps such as /update-lid reconciliations or targeted questions for the team to resolve governance gaps.

When do I need an executive advisory report for LID project alignment?▼

You need an executive advisory report for LID project alignment when you must identify and quantify drift between project artifacts and LID principles, providing a prioritized plan to close documentation gaps across configured or brownfield environments.