legion:review-panel

Automate code review by composing a dynamic expert panel that selects 2-4 reviewer agents based on phase artifacts. The panel evaluates modified file lists using domain-weighted rubrics, deduplicates findings by file location, and produces a consolidated synthesis report with aggregate verdicts.

Deduplicate overlapping reviewer feedback by enforcing severity rules and consolidating findings by file location. The system escalates severity when needed, filters out-of-domain critiques, and generates a unified report to prevent redundant manual cross-checking across specialist reviews.

Domain-weighted rubric evaluation assigns specific criteria to reviewer agents based on detected project domains, ensuring reviewers focus only on their authoritative areas. It enforces confidence thresholds and filters out-of-domain critiques to maintain review accuracy and relevance.

Run a focused review by applying intent-based filters to phase artifacts like CONTEXT.md and SUMMARY.md. The system automatically assembles the required reviewers, collects domain-scoped findings, and outputs a prioritized, consolidated security review report.

Yes, agent-orchestration supports cross-domain reviews by analyzing phase artifacts to detect multiple domains. It dynamically assigns reviewers from the agent pool to handle complex, multi-domain software project evaluations and synthesizes their findings.

Automated synthesis relies on phase artifacts like CONTEXT.md and modified file lists, meaning incomplete project context can limit reviewer assignment accuracy. It filters out-of-domain critiques, so findings outside the detected domains or assigned rubrics are excluded from the final verdict.