What problem does it solve? It locates every place lci performance and correctness are measured (perf gate, goldens, real-project tests, repo-qa banks) and provides a rigorous procedure for honestly comparing lci against tools like ripgrep, Zoekt, Sourcegraph, ctags, LSP servers, Aider, Cursor, Serena, or GitHub code search. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Measurement surface map: Indexes the perf gate (bench_gate.py), integration goldens, real-project latency tests, and the benchmarks/repo-qa/ agent-level harness with exact file and line references. - Comparison methodology: A 10-step procedure covering manifest design, pre-registered predictions, independent oracles, disjoint arms, and evidence auditing. - Claim verification: Tables linking README claims (sub-millisecond search, context reduction) to the benchmarks that back or fail to back them. - Use Case: When asked whether lci beats ripgrep on literal search latency, use this Skill to pick the axis, build an oracle with rg --fixed-strings, run interleaved arms, and report with the audit template. ## Quick Start Use the lci-benchmarks-evaluation skill to find where lci's search latency is measured and design a fair comparison against ripgrep.