What problem does it solve? Existing Korean law study notes (civil, criminal, constitutional) often have missing precedents, statutes, requirements, or structural gaps, and manually supplementing them while preserving source traceability is error-prone. This Skill maintains and improves existing notes without rewriting them from scratch. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Three edit modes: augment (add missing precedents, statutes, requirements, footnotes, backlinks), review (scan for content errors, source mismatches, orphan footnotes, backlink coverage), and restructure (reorder sections by exam-issue frequency data). - Source priority enforcement: Applies a strict source hierarchy (professor materials > official statutes/precedents > peer notes) and flags conflicts instead of silently choosing. - Automatic statute and precedent lookup: Calls korean-law-mcp tools to fetch statute text and holding summaries when notes cite only article numbers or case names. - Use Case: A student asks to fill in missing requirements for a civil law note on voidable acts; the Skill converts noun-style requirement lists into precedent-sentence form, adds footnoted citations, and syncs the consolidated outline. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to supplement your existing civil law note by adding the missing precedent holdings and requirements for the section on voidable legal acts.
