What problem does it solve? Teams accumulate scattered, conflicting information across conversations, documents, research, and meeting notes, making it hard to maintain a trustworthy knowledge base. This Skill consolidates those sources into clean, authoritative reference articles while surfacing contradictions and gaps. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Source Extraction and Weighting: Label every source by type, date, and authority, then extract discrete claims tagged with confidence levels (confirmed, reported, inferred). - Contradiction and Gap Detection: Flag conflicting claims across sources without silently picking one, and identify missing information or outdated data (claims older than 12 months on volatile topics). - Versioned Knowledge Articles: Produce structured articles with inline source attribution, open questions sections, conflict logs, and a version history table with review schedules. - Use Case: After a strategy workshop produces messy notes across three documents, consolidate them into a single competitor-intel article that flags a pricing contradiction between a 2023 and 2024 source and lists missing data points to research. ## Quick Start Synthesize the attached meeting notes and research documents into a structured knowledge base article, flagging any contradictions and information gaps.
