kit-harvest

Automating feedback processing to improve a starter kit involves ingesting project submissions, deduplicating entries, ranking improvements by impact, and applying approved changes. This workflow normalizes scattered input into actionable, versioned updates.

The best way to deduplicate project feedback is to process submissions across multiple projects, classify similar improvements, and rank them by frequency and severity. This ensures only unique, high-impact changes proceed to the approval workflow.

An interactive approval workflow handles versioning by presenting exact diffs before applying changes and logging versioned updates. It allows reviewers to inspect proposed improvements and propagate approved items into release notes.

Yes, you can propagate approved improvements into release notes and What’s New summaries. Once changes pass the interactive approval workflow and are applied, the automated process logs the versioned updates and generates the summaries.

Yes, you need a Master Kit directory to rank improvements by impact. The feedback processing workflow operates within this specific environment to ingest submissions, check conflicts, and apply changes directly to the starter kit.

You should not use an automated workflow for feedback processing when project submissions require manual conflict resolution or when the exact diffs presented in the interactive approval workflow reveal unintended side effects.