kiro-validate-design

Review technical design documents and issue GO/NO-GO decisions.

Updated Apr 17, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/notta50/korenani --skill kiro-validate-design-notta50
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: kiro-validate-design
Source: https://github.com/notta50/korenani/tree/main/.claude/skills/kiro-validate-design
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/notta50/korenani --skill kiro-validate-design-notta50

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill performs an interactive, focused quality review of technical design documents to determine whether a feature design is ready for implementation, highlighting the highest-impact concerns and providing a clear GO/NO-GO decision.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Focused Critical Review: Identifies up to three critical issues that materially affect integration, maintainability, or fulfillment of requirements.
  • Traceable Findings: Links issues to requirements and cites evidence from design.md and steering documents for auditability.
  • Interactive Remediation: Engages the designer with clarifying questions, improvement suggestions, and next-step task recommendations for both GO and NO-GO outcomes.
  • Use Case: Run before implementation to catch architectural misalignments, missing requirements traceability, or maintainability risks for a feature-level design.

Quick Start

Run the kiro-validate-design skill for the feature payments to perform an interactive design review and receive a GO/NO-GO decision with actionable next steps.

Frequently Asked Questions about kiro-validate-design

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
What is technical design validation for implementation readiness?▼

Technical design validation reviews design.md and spec.json against requirements to determine implementation readiness, identifying critical architectural misalignments and providing a GO/NO-GO decision.

How do I review a technical design document for requirements traceability?▼

Load spec.json, requirements.md, and design.md to perform an interactive quality review, linking findings to requirements and citing evidence from steering documents for auditability.

Can I get actionable next steps after a design review go-no-go decision?▼

Yes, after a GO/NO-GO decision, the review engages the designer with clarifying questions, improvement suggestions, and next-step task recommendations to address identified issues.

Does the architecture review limit the number of critical issues reported?▼

Yes, the architecture review limits critical issues to three, focusing on the highest-impact concerns that materially affect integration, maintainability, or requirement fulfillment.

What files do I need for a feature-level design review?▼

You need spec.json, requirements.md, design.md, and core steering files loaded into the context to execute an interactive spec-validation and receive actionable feedback.

Why focus on up to three critical issues during spec validation?▼

Limiting critical issues to three during spec validation ensures focused remediation on architectural misalignments and maintainability risks without overwhelming the designer with minor findings.