What problem does it solve? Reviewing a Japanese Wikipedia article requires checking dozens of policies, guidelines, and style rules across content, sourcing, notability, categories, templates, and notation. This Skill performs a structured, evidence-based peer review so editors get verifiable findings instead of vague impressions. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Policy-grounded review: Checks articles against verifiability, neutral point of view, no original research, biographies of living persons, and copyright policies, citing the exact governing document and section for each finding. - Comprehensive audits: Covers sourcing quality, notability (独立記事作成の目安), categories and DEFAULTSORT, interlanguage and temporary links, templates, Wikidata and authority control, maps and coordinates, and micro-style details. - Structured report with scoring: Produces a standardized report with severity and confidence levels, reproducible findings, improvement priorities, and a 0-100 overall score (or explicit unscorable status). - Use Case: Paste a draft article or provide an article URL before submitting it to Wikipedia:査読依頼, and receive a prioritized list of policy violations, sourcing gaps, and style fixes with links to the governing guidelines. ## Quick Start Ask the AI to review a Japanese Wikipedia article URL, wikitext draft, or diff against current policies and guidelines and return a structured review report with severity-ranked findings and an overall score.
