intendant-dogfood

Report Intendant product friction and efficiency opportunities through the report MCP tool.

14|Updated Mar 2, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/intendant-dev/Intendant --skill intendant-dogfood-intendant-dev
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: intendant-dogfood
Source: https://github.com/intendant-dev/Intendant/tree/main/examples/chatgpt-plugin/plugin-template/skills/intendant-dogfood
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/intendant-dev/Intendant --skill intendant-dogfood-intendant-dev

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? When operating Intendant, agents occasionally hit wrong or missing capabilities, forced workarounds, or avoidable tool calls and latency. This Skill channels those exceptional observations into one concise, deduplicated report instead of losing the signal or flooding the team with noise. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Exception-only reporting: Submit feedback only when Intendant behavior was wrong, misleading, missing, or clearly inefficient; routine successful use produces no report. - Structured report shape: Classify reports with kind (issue or efficiency), a short product surface, a one-line summary, reproduction details, a concrete recommendation, and optional impact and avoidable_calls fields. - Privacy guardrails: Never include transcripts, prompts, environment dumps, tool arguments, credentials, or secrets; use only short scrubbed opaque references in evidence_ref. - Use Case: While using Intendant's facade, you discover a needed verb is missing and must work around it with extra calls. You file one kind: issue report naming the surface, the workaround, and the simpler shape, then continue the user's task. ## Quick Start Ask the agent to report the Intendant friction you just hit through the report MCP tool with a short surface, summary, and recommendation.

Frequently Asked Questions about intendant-dogfood

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
When should I file an Intendant dogfood report?▼

File a report only when Intendant behavior was wrong, misleading, or contradictory, a needed capability was missing and forced a workaround, or the product caused clearly avoidable calls, latency, or context. Routine successful use should produce no report.

How do I report Intendant friction through the MCP report tool?▼

Call the report MCP tool with kind set to issue or efficiency, a short product surface such as facade or agenda, a one-line summary, reproduction details, and a concrete recommendation. Optionally add impact and an avoidable_calls estimate.

What is the difference between issue and efficiency report kinds?▼

Use kind issue for incorrect, missing, or confusing behavior. Use kind efficiency when the product works but a concrete interface improvement would reduce tool calls, latency, or context consumption.

Can I include transcripts or tool output in a dogfood report?▼

No. Never include raw transcripts, prompts, environment dumps, full tool arguments or output, machine names, credentials, tokens, or secrets. Use only a short scrubbed opaque reference such as a session or tool-call id in evidence_ref.

Does filing a dogfood report create a GitHub issue or fix the problem?▼

No. A report is evidence, not a fix or publication. The daemon deduplicates repeat occurrences, and triage, fixes, or external issues remain owner and review decisions.