insight-extraction

Extract and rank sourced insights from research corpora by novelty, decision-relevance, and evidence strength.

1|Updated Jun 30, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Lia-Creative/lia-plugins --skill insight-extraction-lia-creative
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: insight-extraction
Source: https://github.com/Lia-Creative/lia-plugins/tree/main/lia-tools/skills/insight-extraction
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Lia-Creative/lia-plugins --skill insight-extraction-lia-creative

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Discovery material accumulates faster than anyone reads it, so the same patterns get rediscovered repeatedly while the strongest cross-source insights are never found. This Skill turns a pile of chats, feedback rounds, or research packs into a short, ranked, sourced list of insights deduplicated against an existing ledger. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Scored ranking: Scores every candidate on convergence, emergence, surprise, tension, and decision-relevance, keeping only the top three to seven. - Ledger deduplication: Checks candidates against the existing insights ledger, marking re-confirmations and strengthening existing entries instead of duplicating them. - Evidence-capped confidence: Assigns forming, firming, or firm confidence based on who and how many sources back each claim, with founder-only evidence capped at forming. - Use Case: Point it at a folder of user interview notes and ask what stands out; it returns a ranked list of insights with evidence, confidence levels, and the decision each one would change. ## Quick Start Ask the agent to mine the attached research notes and pull out the insights that would change a product decision.

Frequently Asked Questions about insight-extraction

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I extract insights from user interview notes?▼

Point the Skill at the folder or corpus of interview notes and ask what stands out. It reads distilled summaries first, extracts non-obvious load-bearing claims, scores them, and returns a ranked list of three to seven insights with evidence and confidence levels.

What makes a good insight versus a simple observation?▼

An insight is a claim that would change a decision, not just a fact. The Skill scores candidates on convergence across sources, emergence, surprise, tension between findings, and decision-relevance, dropping anything true-but-obvious or interesting-but-unactionable.

How does insight confidence scoring work?▼

Confidence follows three levels: forming for one source, firming for two or three people, and firm for consistent cross-roster or triangulated evidence. A single chat can never make an insight firm, and founder-only evidence stays at forming regardless of volume.

Does this replace user interview intake or transcription?▼

No. Intake is handled separately by ingest skills that turn raw chats into notes, profiles, and problem pages. This Skill reads what those produced and mines the distilled layer for patterns, drilling into raw material only for shortlisted candidates.

When should I not use corpus-based insight mining?▼

Avoid it for synthetic or hypothetical user data, since hypotheses never enter the ledger, and for settled strategy questions, which belong in strategy docs. It also does not promote insights into canon or open tickets; firm insights are only proposed upward.