improve-lean-optimums

Diagnose Lean4-calculated metric range deviations using formal proofs.

1|Updated Jul 12, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Tyler-R-Kendrick/slm-training --skill improve-lean-optimums
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: improve-lean-optimums
Source: https://github.com/Tyler-R-Kendrick/slm-training/tree/main/.agents/skills/improve-lean-optimums
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Tyler-R-Kendrick/slm-training --skill improve-lean-optimums

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This skill addresses the challenge of maintaining rigorous research standards when model performance metrics fall outside of preregistered, Lean4-verified bands.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Certified Metric Verification: Replays metric certificates against formal Lean4 proofs to ensure data integrity.
  • Tiered Disposition Logic: Provides a structured framework for deciding whether to continue, stop, or block model promotion based on formal evidence.
  • Hypothesis-Driven Diagnosis: Guides the user through five specific diagnosis lanes (measurement, training, architecture, model, assumptions) to ensure evidence-based improvements.

Quick Start

Use the improve-lean-optimums skill to verify the latest metric certificate and diagnose the cause of the current band miss.

Frequently Asked Questions about improve-lean-optimums

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I verify model training metrics against Lean4 formal proofs?▼

Verify model training metrics against Lean4 formal proofs by replaying metric certificates to confirm data integrity and adherence to theorem-backed performance gates. This validates that observations satisfy preregistered bands.

What is the best way to diagnose model performance when metrics fall outside preregistered bands?▼

Diagnosing model performance when metrics miss preregistered bands involves a hypothesis-driven framework exploring five specific lanes: measurement, training, architecture, model, and assumptions. This ensures evidence-based improvements grounded in formal verification.

Do I need a Lean4 theorem prover environment to run formal verification on training metrics?▼

Yes, you need a Lean4 theorem prover environment and local Python-based metric verification scripts. These dependencies ensure architectural and mathematical consistency when validating metric certificates for formal research campaigns.

How do I decide whether to block or continue model promotion based on formal evidence?▼

Decide whether to continue, stop, or block model promotion using tiered disposition logic based on formal evidence. This framework evaluates verified metric certificates to determine if performance strictly meets theorem-backed gates.

Why does formal metric verification fail when evaluation observations deviate from Lean4-calculated ranges?▼

Formal metric verification fails when evaluation observations deviate from Lean4-calculated ranges because the metric certificates no longer mathematically satisfy the preregistered theorem-backed bands. The skill refines these ranges and diagnoses the underlying cause across five specific lanes.