idea-critic

Coordinate multi-model critiques of research hypotheses and designs.

Updated Apr 15, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/sheehe/coase --skill idea-critic
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: idea-critic
Source: https://github.com/sheehe/coase/tree/main/resources/plugins/coase-builtin/skills/idea-critic
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/sheehe/coase --skill idea-critic

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Coordinates independent, multi-model critiques of research hypotheses, designs, and results to improve robustness and insight.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Parallel, multi-model evaluation across hypothesis, design, and result critique.
  • Modes: discuss, score, design-critique, result-critique, preserving per-model outputs with a unified consensus summary.
  • Human-in-the-loop support and configurable critic providers to balance bias and comprehensiveness.

Quick Start

Coordinate independent, multi-model critiques of the given hypothesis set using all selected providers and return per-model analyses with a final consensus summary.

Frequently Asked Questions about idea-critic

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I run multi-model critiques on a research hypothesis?▼

To run multi-model critiques on a research hypothesis, configure a diverse panel of providers to perform parallel evaluations. The system coordinates independent critiques and returns per-model analyses alongside a final consensus and divergence summary.

What is multimodel consensus evaluation for research design?▼

Multimodel consensus evaluation for research design is a technique where independent providers critique a study's methodology. It generates per-model outputs with preserved raw responses and aggregates them into a structured summary highlighting agreement and divergence.

Can I use human-in-the-loop review during multimodel design critique?▼

Yes, you can use human-in-the-loop review during multimodel design critique. The system supports configurable critic providers and human-in-the-loop interactions to balance provider bias and comprehensiveness across hypothesis evaluation and result critique.

What modes are available for research result critique?▼

Available modes for research result critique include discuss, score, design-critique, and result-critique. These modes preserve per-model outputs and generate a unified consensus summary to improve research robustness and insight.

When should I use multimodel critiques instead of a single model for research evaluation?▼

You should use multimodel critiques instead of a single model when you need to balance bias and improve robustness across hypothesis evaluation. Coordinating a diverse panel of providers ensures structured aggregation with consensus and divergence summaries.