What problem does it solve? Teams building Islamic or values-driven software lack a structured way to evaluate provider responsibilities—privacy, monetization, moderation, AI behavior, lock-in, governance—without conflating design reasoning with religious rulings. This Skill provides a disciplined review workflow with clear authority boundaries and auditable, persisted reports. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Action-routed reviews: 22 review actions (compliance-check, business-model-review, ai-data-review, moral-diff-review, guided-discovery, and more) mapped to canonical report templates and domain heuristics. - Evidence discipline: Context discovery gates, evidence levels, missing-evidence tracking, and stable finding IDs (IVSD-Fnnn/IVSD-Mnnn) prevent overclaiming and keep reports auditable. - Authority boundaries: Escalates halal/haram, riba, and contested religious-legal questions to qualified scholars instead of issuing fatwa-like conclusions. - Use Case: Before pushing a PR that adds paid subscriptions to a community app, run a moral-diff-review to assess pricing clarity, cancellation fairness, and riba exposure, producing a persisted report under islamic-value-sensitive-design/workstreams/. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to run an I-VSD compliance-check on this repository's pricing, privacy, and moderation practices and write the report to the default output folder.
