html-comparison-matrix

Generate interactive weighted comparison matrices with adjustable sliders and JSON export.

Updated May 5, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/ethan-rio/skills --skill html-comparison-matrix
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: html-comparison-matrix
Source: https://github.com/ethan-rio/skills/tree/main/skills/html/html-comparison-matrix
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/ethan-rio/skills --skill html-comparison-matrix

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill eliminates the inconsistency and bias of ad-hoc comparisons when evaluating multiple named candidates against multiple criteria, ensuring decisions are transparent, weighted, and easy to defend to stakeholders.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Interactive Weighted Matrices: Generates self-contained HTML files with live-updating scoring grids, adjustable weight sliders, and per-candidate score rationales.
  • Hard Requirement Guardrails: Surfaces disqualifying failures for non-negotiable criteria so users don't select ineligible candidates.
  • Use Cases: Ideal for library/vendor selection, build-vs-buy decisions, and architectural pattern comparisons where 2+ named candidates need to be evaluated against multiple weighted criteria.

Quick Start

Use the html-comparison-matrix skill to build a weighted scoring matrix to compare LaunchDarkly, Unleash, and Flagsmith for your feature flag needs, with criteria for price, on-prem support, SDK ecosystem, dev experience, and observability.

Frequently Asked Questions about html-comparison-matrix

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I build a weighted comparison matrix for vendor selection?▼

Build a weighted comparison matrix by listing named candidates and evaluation criteria, applying weights to criteria, and scoring each candidate to generate transparent, defensible vendor selection decisions. Live-adjustable sliders recalculate totals in real time.

What is a weighted scoring model for build-versus-buy analysis?▼

A weighted scoring model for build-versus-buy analysis evaluates named candidates against multiple criteria with assigned weights. It produces transparent scoring grids with per-candidate score rationales to ensure architectural decisions are defensible to stakeholders.

Can I export comparison matrix scores to JSON?▼

Yes, you can export comparison matrix scores to JSON. Generating interactive weighted matrices produces self-contained HTML artifacts that include a JSON export of the final verdict, capturing total scores and rationales for downstream analysis.

How do I enforce hard requirements during library evaluation?▼

Enforce hard requirements during library evaluation by applying disqualification checks to non-negotiable criteria. The comparison matrix surfaces disqualifying failures for ineligible candidates so they are eliminated before final scoring adjustments are applied.

Does the comparison matrix support sensitivity analysis?▼

Yes, the comparison matrix supports sensitivity analysis by providing live-adjustable weight sliders. Adjusting criteria weights triggers real-time total recalculation across named candidates, letting you observe how weight changes impact the final decision verdict.

What is the best way to compare architectural patterns for a new project?▼

The best way to compare architectural patterns is to evaluate 2 or more named candidates against multiple weighted criteria using an interactive comparison matrix. This generates self-contained HTML artifacts with score rationales, ensuring transparent architectural choices.