What problem does it solve? Technical decisions often rest on unverified claims, single sources, or outdated documentation. This Skill structures technical research into an evidence-anchored report where every claim carries a URL or file:line anchor, and unverified statements are explicitly tagged as assumed. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Two research modes: breadth mode surveys up to 5 sources to compare multiple options; depth mode drills up to 10 sources into one topic including changelogs, CVEs, and migration paths. - Evidence verification: applies a two-way Evidence Filter classifying claims as VERIFIED, ASSUMED, PRIOR, or CONFLICTING, with source triangulation across official docs, maintainer blogs, and production case studies. - Structured reports: generates a ranked recommendation with a trade-off matrix, references, and open questions saved to plans/reports/. - Use Case: Before choosing a real-time sync library, run a breadth research pass to compare options on performance, security, and maturity, then receive a ranked recommendation with anchored evidence. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to research a technical question such as comparing authentication libraries, optionally specifying breadth or depth mode.