hara-orchestrator

Orchestrate Stage0–Stage4 HARA workflows with isolated sub-agents and validation gates.

2|Updated May 13, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/WSJ40/hara-mutiagent --skill hara-orchestrator
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: hara-orchestrator
Source: https://github.com/WSJ40/hara-mutiagent/tree/main/skills/hara-orchestrator
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/WSJ40/hara-mutiagent --skill hara-orchestrator

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

It solves the complexity of running a full end-to-end HARA workflow consistently across multiple stages, while enforcing validation gates and producing the final JSON/Excel deliverables.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • End-to-end HARA orchestration: Coordinates Stage0 through Stage4, including per-Function and per-MF execution boundaries.
  • Quality gates & recovery: Runs deterministic checks between stages (e.g., stage JSON validation) and supports rerunning specific failed stages without redoing everything.
  • Strict multi-agent isolation: Ensures each stage/review work runs in properly isolated sub-agents and communicates only via JSON artifacts.

Quick Start

Run hara-orchestrator to parse your source documents and automatically generate gated Stage0–Stage4 HARA outputs in output/<RUN_ID>.json and output/<RUN_ID>.xlsx.

Frequently Asked Questions about hara-orchestrator

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate end-to-end HARA generation across multiple stages with validation gates?▼

End-to-end HARA generation is automated by dispatching isolated per-Function and per-MF sub-agent work across Stage0 through Stage4, running deterministic validation checks between stages to ensure safety analysis consistency before final export.

Can I rerun specific failed stages in a multi-agent safety analysis workflow without redoing everything?▼

Yes, specific failed stages in the multi-agent safety analysis workflow can be rerun individually because the orchestrator runs deterministic validation gates between stages and supports recovery without executing the entire pipeline from scratch.

How do multi-agent orchestration workflows enforce JSON-only communication for HARA scenario generation?▼

Multi-agent orchestration workflows enforce JSON-only communication by ensuring each stage and review process runs in properly isolated sub-agents that exchange artifacts exclusively through validated JSON schemas, satisfying strict inter-agent communication requirements.

Does this HARA orchestration workflow export results to both JSON and Excel formats?▼

Yes, the HARA orchestration workflow exports final deliverables to both JSON and Excel formats, generating structured output files in your designated output directory after Stage4 SG_Sum derivation and SEC evaluation are complete.

What is the best way to handle Stage3A and Stage3B scenario generation in an automated safety analysis pipeline?▼

The best way to handle Stage3A and Stage3B scenario generation is using a gated orchestration pipeline that dispatches isolated sub-agent work for SEC evaluation, followed by Stage4 SG_Sum derivation with stop-on-validation-error behavior.

Why does multi-agent workflow automation require stage-specific schema routing for safety analysis?▼

Multi-agent workflow automation requires stage-specific schema routing to ensure deterministic validation gates can accurately verify JSON artifacts between Stage0 and Stage4, preventing invalid safety analysis data from propagating downstream.