gtgt(グツグツ)

Analyze plans to surface assumptions, risks, and actionable improvements.

Updated Mar 19, 2013
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/kawaken/dotfiles --skill gtgt
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: gtgt(グツグツ)
Source: https://github.com/kawaken/dotfiles/tree/main/claude/skills/gtgt
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/kawaken/dotfiles --skill gtgt

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill helps teams rigorously vet plans by simulating a Devil's Advocate to surface assumptions, risks, and gaps early in the planning process.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Phase 1: Devil's Advocate analysis to identify dangerous premises and worst-case scenarios.
  • Phase 2: Systematic analysis that evaluates technical feasibility and requirement coverage.
  • Phase 3: Checklist-style summary to guide decision-making and required refinements.
  • Iterative refinement with clear actionable feedback and traceable decision points for stakeholders.

Quick Start

Provide your plan and have gtgt perform a Devil's Advocate review followed by a structured analysis to validate and tighten the plan.

Frequently Asked Questions about gtgt(グツグツ)

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I identify hidden assumptions and risks in a project plan?▼

You can surface hidden assumptions by applying a Devil's Advocate analysis to your project plan, which systematically identifies dangerous premises and evaluates worst-case scenarios before execution.

What is the best way to validate technical feasibility and requirement coverage?▼

Validating technical feasibility and requirement coverage involves applying a systematic two-phase analysis that evaluates technical constraints, edge cases, and stakeholder impacts against existing development workflows.

How do I challenge a project plan to ensure it covers edge cases and dependencies?▼

Challenging a project plan to ensure coverage of edge cases and dependencies requires applying a Devil's Advocate review followed by structured analysis to surface gaps and tighten requirement validation.

Can I use Devil's Advocate analysis to improve stakeholder communication for decision-making?▼

Yes, Devil's Advocate analysis improves stakeholder communication by generating a checklist-style summary that provides actionable feedback and traceable decision points for plan refinements.

Does rigorous plan vetting work without disrupting existing development workflows?▼

Rigorous plan vetting works without disrupting existing development workflows by ensuring guardrails, error handling, and decision-ready outputs align with your current project goals and processes.