grill-with-docs

Validate technical proposals against project documentation and ADRs.

3|Updated Jun 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/XinAloha/skills --skill grill-with-docs-xinaloha
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: grill-with-docs
Source: https://github.com/XinAloha/skills/tree/main/methodology/grill-with-docs
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/XinAloha/skills --skill grill-with-docs-xinaloha

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill addresses the gap between high-level architectural decisions and actual implementation by forcing a rigorous, document-driven review of proposed changes.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Context-Aware Review: Validates proposals against existing ADRs (Architecture Decision Records) and project terminology.
  • Boundary Testing: Uses specific, edge-case scenarios to challenge the robustness of your technical logic.
  • Use Case: When proposing a new data source integration, the skill will cross-reference your plan with existing ADRs to ensure you aren't violating established architectural constraints or naming conventions.

Quick Start

Trigger the grill-with-docs skill to review your current architectural proposal against the existing ADRs and project context.

Frequently Asked Questions about grill-with-docs

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I validate architectural designs against existing project documentation?▼

To validate architectural designs, you cross-reference technical proposals with existing ADRs and project terminology to ensure compliance with established architectural constraints and naming conventions.

What is an ADR review for technical proposals?▼

An ADR review for technical proposals is a document-driven validation process that pressure-tests new software designs against Architecture Decision Records to prevent violating established project boundaries.

How do I check if a new data source integration violates architectural constraints?▼

You check new data source integrations by applying context-aware boundary testing that cross-references the integration plan against existing ADRs to identify violations of established architectural constraints.

Can I use design review processes to manage technical debt?▼

Yes, you can use rigorous design review processes to manage technical debt by forcing document-driven validation that ensures new implementations align with high-level architectural decisions and established constraints.

When do I need document-driven consistency checks for software engineering workflows?▼

You need document-driven consistency checks when proposing architectural changes that require rigorous design review, ensuring domain-specific terminology adherence and architectural constraint verification.