What problem does it solve? Plans often use vague or conflicting terminology and make undocumented architectural decisions that future readers cannot understand. This Skill runs a structured interrogation of your plan against your project's existing domain language and documented decisions, updating CONTEXT.md and ADRs as conclusions are reached. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Socratic Plan Review: Asks one question at a time, walking each branch of the design tree and providing a recommended answer for every question. - Terminology Enforcement: Challenges terms that conflict with the existing CONTEXT.md glossary and sharpens fuzzy language into canonical terms. - Inline Documentation Updates: Updates CONTEXT.md the moment a term is resolved and offers ADRs only when a decision is hard to reverse, surprising, and the result of a real trade-off. - Use Case: Before implementing a new order cancellation feature, run a grilling session to reconcile your plan with the existing glossary, verify the code's actual behavior, and record the cancellation policy decision as an ADR. ## Quick Start Start a grilling session on my plan for the new feature and challenge it against our CONTEXT.md and existing ADRs.