grill-me

Guide teams through plan design with structured questioning and branch tracking.

1|Updated Mar 17, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/ozby/ingest-lens --skill grill-me-ozby
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: grill-me
Source: https://github.com/ozby/ingest-lens/tree/main/.agents/skills/grill-me
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/ozby/ingest-lens --skill grill-me-ozby

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill helps teams reach clear alignment by relentlessly questioning a plan or design, uncovering assumptions, and resolving decision-tree branches until a shared understanding is achieved.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Guided, branch-by-branch questioning to dissect plans and designs.
  • Dependency-aware exploration that surfaces hidden risks and unresolved decisions.
  • Codebase-aware probing: when relevant, it investigates the project code to ground questions in implementation details.
  • Suitable for design reviews, architecture sessions, and plan validations with multiple stakeholders.

Quick Start

Initiate a grilled review by providing a plan or design and follow prompts until agreement is reached.

Frequently Asked Questions about grill-me

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I validate a design plan with stakeholders using a decision tree?▼

Validate a design plan by guiding stakeholders through branch-by-branch questioning that tracks dependencies and resolves unresolved decisions until shared understanding is achieved.

What is the best way to uncover hidden assumptions during a design review?▼

Uncover hidden assumptions during a design review by applying relentless, dependency-aware questioning that surfaces risks and tests a plan's dependencies across multiple branches.

How do I ensure full comprehension of an engineering plan across multiple sessions?▼

Ensure full comprehension of an engineering plan by using a structured questioning workflow that tracks branches, prompts for recommended answers, and validates dependencies across sessions.

Can I use codebase-aware probing to ground questions in implementation details?▼

Yes, codebase-aware probing investigates the project codebase when relevant, grounding stakeholder questions in actual implementation details to validate plans.

Does design review questioning work for architecture sessions with multiple stakeholders?▼

Yes, design review questioning works for architecture sessions by dissecting plans and designs collaboratively with multiple stakeholders to reach clear alignment.

What are the limitations of using a structured questioning workflow for plan validation?▼

Structured questioning workflows for plan validation require stakeholders to follow prompts until agreement is reached, which may be time-consuming for complex dependency trees across multiple sessions.