What problem does it solve? Responding to journal referee reports requires parsing every comment, triaging by priority, coordinating manuscript edits, and producing a formal response letter. This Skill automates that entire revision pipeline so no referee point is missed and the manuscript stays consistent. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Referee Report Parsing & Triage: Extracts and categorizes each referee comment by type (physics concern, clarity, missing reference, new calculation) and priority (must address, should address, optional), including editor decision context from staged review ledgers. - Coordinated Manuscript Revision: Groups revision items by affected LaTeX section and delegates targeted edits to paper-writer subagents, with revision markers, compilation checks, and a bounded 3-iteration consistency loop. - Dual Response Artifacts: Produces both an internal author-response tracker (.gpd/AUTHOR-RESPONSE.md) and a journal-facing response letter (.gpd/paper/REFEREE_RESPONSE.md plus paper/response-letter.tex), kept synchronized and committed. - Use Case: After receiving a major-revision decision with two referee reports on a physics manuscript, run this Skill to parse the reports, apply section edits, route requested new calculations into research phases, and generate the resubmission response letter. ## Quick Start Ask the AI to respond to the referee report at the given file path and revise the manuscript in the paper directory accordingly.
