What problem does it solve? Teams often claim model improvements based on single runs, contaminated benchmarks, or misleading metrics, leading to false wins that fail in production. Gauge designs rigorous evaluations that separate real gains from noise, leakage, and metric gaming. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Metric Selection: Chooses metrics that match the task's cost structure (accuracy vs. precision/recall vs. calibration) and names what each metric ignores. - Eval Set & Baseline Design: Builds clean, uncontaminated eval sets with trivial, strong-prior, and current-system baselines, plus contamination and leakage checks. - Significance & Slice Analysis: Requires multi-seed runs with variance reporting and breaks headline scores out by subgroup to catch hidden regressions. - Use Case: A team claims a new model improved 3 points on a public benchmark. Gauge flags likely test-set contamination, demands 5-seed runs with significance testing, and designs a held-out eval with per-slice reporting before the claim ships. ## Quick Start Ask Gauge to evaluate whether your model's benchmark improvement is statistically real and design a proper eval harness with baselines.