gap-running-destruction

Stress-test hypothesis registers by forcing adversarial validation and exposing hidden failure modes.

37|5|Updated Nov 18, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/BellaBe/strategy-os --skill gap-running-destruction
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: gap-running-destruction
Source: https://github.com/BellaBe/strategy-os/tree/main/.claude/skills/gap-running-destruction
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/BellaBe/strategy-os --skill gap-running-destruction

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill helps teams rigorously challenge hypothesis registers by performing structured destruction, red-team responses, and constraint inversions to reveal gaps, blind spots, and kill signals before execution.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Pre-mortem scenario planning: simulate 12-month failure cascades.
  • Red-team response modeling: anticipate incumbent counteractions and their impact on the plan.
  • Constraint inversions & evidence audit: systematically flip assumptions and trace consequences.
  • Contradiction detection: surface mismatches between claims, evidence, and kill conditions.
  • Gap-enforcement readiness: produce actionable insights for decision gating.

Quick Start

Run a destruction pass against the current hypothesis register and document a traceable 12-month failure chain.

Frequently Asked Questions about gap-running-destruction

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I stress-test a hypothesis register before execution?▼

Adversarially validate a hypothesis register by forcing red-team responses and constraint inversions to expose hidden failure modes and link findings to specific assumptions.

What is the best way to simulate failure cascades in pre-mortem planning?▼

Simulate failure cascades in pre-mortem planning by modeling 12-month failure chains and mapping incumbent counteractions to reveal where the strategy could break under adversarial conditions.

How does red-team response modeling improve risk analysis?▼

Red-team response modeling improves risk analysis by anticipating incumbent counteractions, systematically flipping assumptions, and tracing consequences to surface mismatches between claims and evidence.

Can I use constraint inversions to detect contradictions in strategy governance?▼

Use constraint inversions to detect contradictions in strategy governance by flipping assumptions and tracing consequences to surface mismatches between claims, evidence, and kill conditions.

When do I need a kill-signal audit for decision gating?▼

You need a kill-signal audit for decision gating when preparing for execution, ensuring gap-enforcement readiness by producing actionable insights that link findings to specific hypotheses.

What are the limitations of relying only on pre-mortem planning without red-team analysis?▼

Relying only on pre-mortem planning without red-team analysis limits exposure to incumbent counteractions and constraint inversions, missing contradictions between claims, evidence, and kill conditions.