Orchestrates a two-agent adversarial debate to author and ratify constitutional rules.
npx skills add https://github.com/arpitarya/fux --skill fux-debate-arpitarya
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: fux-debate Source: https://github.com/arpitarya/fux/tree/main/archive/v0.1/fux/data/skills/debate Command: npx skills add https://github.com/arpitarya/fux --skill fux-debate-arpitarya
.fux/debates/<rule-id>.md and hands the user the fux ratify command, which hashes the transcript into ratification.debate_hash and opens a PR on protected branches. - Decision capture: Routes the concluded debate as a tamper-evident ADR via fux capture-decision with a money/PII firewall for sensitive routes. - Use Case: A team wants to add the rule "never commit money docs or PII" as a constitutional invariant; the host agent runs the debate, captures dissent, and the human ratifies it with an auditable hashed transcript. ## Quick Start Run /fux debate "never commit money docs or PII; plans live in elgar" --tier constitutional and follow the debate procedure to ratify the rule.High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
Run /fux debate with your proposed rule and --tier constitutional. The host agent spawns two sub-agents with identical briefs and no assigned sides, runs blind first passes plus adversarial rounds, then hands you the fux ratify command to complete ratification yourself.
A rule is constitutional only if a wrong answer costs money, PII, audit, or trust and the rule never legitimately changes. Constitutional rules get an extra adversarial round on instant agreement and enter the apex via fux ratify; everything else is standard tier.
The only intelligence spent is the host session's own tokens and the two sub-agents it spawns. Fux itself runs no model and makes no API call; it only provides the deterministic harness that captures, hashes, and ratifies the transcript.
The host escalates to the human with both final positions side by side and the unresolved crux. No rule is authored or ratified until the human acts as tie-breaker, after which the transcript including their ruling is written and ratified.
The anti-sycophancy gates prevent rubber-stamping: an agent that raises no concrete objection is sent back, and convergence only counts after both agents genuinely tried to falsify the rule. This surfaces failure modes a lone author would rationalize away.
No. On a protected branch with a remote, fux ratify automatically writes on a new constitution/<rule-id> branch and opens a PR, which merges only after required fux gate and ai-review checks pass. The --no-pr flag does a local offline ratify instead.
theodrosyimerCreate, query, and supersede ADR files under docs/adr/ with sequential naming.
volter-aiConverts roadmap items into labeled GitHub tracking issues and keeps the roadmap ordered.
tsunami28Create MADR-style Architecture Decision Records following repository conventions.
vinaykumarvkEvaluate ideas through structured adversarial debate and generate markdown reports.