What problem does it solve? UI work often ships with inconsistent design system usage, generic aesthetics, accessibility gaps, or unclear user flows, and teams lack a repeatable rubric to evaluate frontend quality before merge. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Design Review Mode: Evaluate existing UI against design system compliance (Figma specs, design tokens, component variants), three quality pillars (Frictionless, Quality Craft, Trustworthy), and accessibility grades. - Creative Frontend Mode: Create distinctive interfaces with committed aesthetic direction covering typography, color, motion, spatial composition, and backgrounds while avoiding generic patterns. - Structured Review Output: Produce scored reviews with blocking/major/minor issues, pillar status tables, and prioritized recommendations using the provided output template. - Use Case: During a PR review of a new dashboard component, run a design review to verify design token usage, keyboard navigation, and action hierarchy, then return a pass/needs-work verdict with concrete fixes. ## Quick Start Review this UI component implementation for design system compliance, accessibility, and the three quality pillars, then give me a scored verdict with prioritized issues.
