What problem does it solve? Project documentation drifts from reality, and self-review misses blind spots. This Skill acts as an independent senior reviewer that loads project context cold, verifies claims against live data and running systems, and critiques everything against one question: does this work push the case study toward earning the next interview by the submission deadline? ## Core Features & Use Cases - Cold-context loading: Reads the case prompt, status docs, project trackers, architecture overview, and recent git history in a defined order to rebuild current project state. - Claim verification: Runs the repo's own check script, queries live databases, inspects the running product, and spot-checks citations instead of trusting documentation. - Endpoint-anchored critique: Applies five lenses (endpoint drift, demo truth, defensibility, blind spots, sequencing) and delivers ranked risks, next moves, and explicit disagreements. - Use Case: Before a weekly planning session, ask for a review to discover that a claimed data-coverage metric does not match the live database and that current work is off the critical path to the demo. ## Quick Start Use fli-review to load the current project context, verify recent claims against live data, and give me an endpoint-anchored critique with top risks and next moves.
