What problem does it solve? Graduate accounting case-study theses often fail review because analysis chapters read as chronological narratives with unsupported conclusions. This Skill structures the analysis chapter by splitting it into logical dimensions, building five-step argumentation chains, and verifying that every core judgment is backed by evidence. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Dimension Splitting by Case Type: Maps six case types (audit failure, financial fraud, financial analysis, internal control, M&A, profit model) to their appropriate analytical frameworks such as GONE, fraud triangle, Harvard framework, and COSO. - Five-Step Argumentation Chains: Enforces the structure of phenomenon description, evidence presentation, mechanism analysis, consequence judgment, and institutional linkage for every analysis paragraph. - Claim-Evidence Mapping: Checks that each core judgment has at least two pieces of medium-or-strong evidence and that each argument paragraph cites concrete facts from the case chapter. - Use Case: A graduate student writing an audit-failure thesis uses this Skill after evidence collection to produce an analysis blueprint with dimension breakdown, logic chains, table layouts, and a claim-evidence map before drafting the chapter. ## Quick Start Run the Phase 5 analysis design step to split my case analysis chapter into logical dimensions and generate the argumentation chains and claim-evidence mapping table.
