What problem does it solve? Writing the recommendations chapter of an accounting case-study thesis often drifts from the analysis chapter, producing generic advice like "strengthen supervision" that reviewers reject. This Skill enforces a strict one-to-one mapping between Chapter 4 problems and Chapter 5 countermeasures so every recommendation is traceable and actionable. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Ch4-Ch5 One-to-One Mapping: Extracts every problem identified in the Chapter 4 draft and generates exactly one corresponding countermeasure, blocking additions or omissions. - Three-Part Recommendation Structure: Each countermeasure follows a fixed pattern of problem restatement, actionable suggestion with a clear actor, and softened expected-effect statement. - Rule Enforcement and Validation: Applies P0/P1 writing rules (no parenthetical explanations, no arrows, paragraph-first-sentence patterns, 6,500-7,000 word range) and validates output via chapter_check.py before completion. - Use Case: A graduate student finishing an audit-failure case thesis loads this Skill after Chapter 4 is complete; it reads the Chapter 4 draft, builds an alignment table, and writes a compliant Chapter 5 with each recommendation labeled by its source analysis section. ## Quick Start Run the fcc-6-ch5-recommend skill to write Chapter 5 recommendations based on my completed Chapter 4 draft.
